I’m reading J. I. Packer’s book The Thirty-Nine Articles. In it, Packer says that the Articles are not ambiguous, as some aver. Rather, they are 1) minimalistic, in that they don’t deal with the secondary issues of topics covered, and 2) eclectic. containing elements of the ecumenical creeds from the first centuries, Swiss reformed elements, Lutheran, and Reformed or Calvinistic elements. An example of how the Articles do expressly take a stand on issues is what we find in Articles 28 & 29 on the Lord’s Supper. – p. 608 in the 1928. Article 28: parag. 1 – this is against Zwinglian ideas – not a partaking of the body and blood parag. 2 – against Rome & transubstantiation parag. 3 – against the Lutheran view of consubstantiation – Calvin’s language is used instead parag. 4 – against Romanist practices Article 29: this is against Lutheran consubstantiation; it was opposed by one or two pro-Lutheran bishops. On the Lord’s Supper, the Ang. Ch. de...